![]() As with the first film, some of these are very inventive and clever, some are just absolutely hideous and seemingly devised simply to be more horrific than those seen in the first film, and some are both! There were one or two where I had to cover my eyes for the anticipated climax of the trap but still felt just as grossed out and horrified as though I'd been brave enough to watch it fully - Saw is very good at this even if you don't see it or if they don't show it fully, your mind fills in the gaps from the implied and you experience the full horror of it anyway. The setting is very dank, dark and claustrophobic - the perfect backdrop for the gruesome new traps set by Jigsaw. This gives room for some fairly standard 'lets work together' vs 'lets screw each other over' dynamics to play out amongst the moral messages woven into each victim's plight, but with a few good surprises along the way. This first sequel I think is actually really good - it extends and evolves the overall narrative of serial killer 'Jigsaw' from the previous film, so it has both a strong sense of continuity and development, whilst also offering up a new setting along with a new dynamic - this time there are 7 victims all locked inside a house of horrors together and the house is filled with a nerve agent that is slowly killing them and leaves them with just two hours to work through Jigsaw's traps to survive. I did see the original Saw film years and years ago and remembered I enjoyed it (or at least enjoyed hating the horror of it!) then saw part of one of the sequels not long ago and thought I may as well get the whole set of films and watch them in order for a mass gross-out. To learn more about how and for what purposes Amazon uses personal information (such as Amazon Store order history), please visit our Privacy Notice. You can change your choices at any time by visiting Cookie Preferences, as described in the Cookie Notice. Click ‘Customise Cookies’ to decline these cookies, make more detailed choices, or learn more. Third parties use cookies for their purposes of displaying and measuring personalised ads, generating audience insights, and developing and improving products. This includes using first- and third-party cookies, which store or access standard device information such as a unique identifier. If you agree, we’ll also use cookies to complement your shopping experience across the Amazon stores as described in our Cookie Notice. We also use these cookies to understand how customers use our services (for example, by measuring site visits) so we can make improvements. Bored Panda has already made a list of the most interesting and unusual appearances of stars in lesser roles, so here is the second part of our collection for you!įeel free to scroll to the very end, promise not to be surprised when you see familiar faces in completely unexpected images, and perhaps this post will be an occasion for you to revisit something from the good old ages of cinema, when our world was still very young, and the greatest movie stars were extremely small.We use cookies and similar tools that are necessary to enable you to make purchases, to enhance your shopping experiences and to provide our services, as detailed in our Cookie Notice. The online database IMDb has collected a selection of little-known roles of star actresses and actors whose names are ringing all over the world today. Even for the worldwide recognized movie stars. What can we say about those Hollywood stars who have long and stubbornly walked to the top, filming along the way in sometimes completely disgusting, low-budget and simply uninteresting films and TV shows? An acting career is like a cardiogram, it has its ups and downs, and sometimes the latter are no less than the former.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |